1993-03-01 - Re: Infrastructure

Header Data

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
To: nobody@alumni.cco.caltech.edu
Message Hash: 6bbfe9989799386c617ef8adc059a06132d819843b61a014053080305b07f14f
Message ID: <9303011220.aa06293@penet.penet.FI>
Reply To: <9303010605.AA10013@alumni.cco.caltech.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-01 11:06:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:06:52 PST

Raw message

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:06:52 PST
To: nobody@alumni.cco.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: Infrastructure
In-Reply-To: <9303010605.AA10013@alumni.cco.caltech.edu>
Message-ID: <9303011220.aa06293@penet.penet.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

> I'm not really sure what is happening with PGP specifically in terms
> of MIME.  I think there has been some work done with PEM integration.
> There doesn't seem to be any reason why these programs can't integrate
> nicely with MIME, and this Metamail package looks like it might be the
> most cost-effective way of getting widespread encryption into use.

Definitely. The work I am doing on integrating PGP into anon.penet.fi is
based on metamail. Makes it really easy to add PEM etc.