From: J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
To: derek@cs.wisc.edu (Derek Zahn)
Message Hash: 7621efaacadddae2530a31634fe67ae5c5c16162ab89dea79388e5c3671861db
Message ID: <9303112121.AA28347@triton.unm.edu>
Reply To: <9303111501.AA26622@lynx.cs.wisc.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-11 21:24:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Mar 93 13:24:44 PST
From: J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 93 13:24:44 PST
To: derek@cs.wisc.edu (Derek Zahn)
Subject: Re: Hidden encrypted messages
In-Reply-To: <9303111501.AA26622@lynx.cs.wisc.edu>
Message-ID: <9303112121.AA28347@triton.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Alex's (good) idea about using creative spacing to hide an encrypted message
> is similar to that what I'd originally proposed (and of course it has to
> be hiding an *encrypted* message!). I've gotten a number of responses
> of the form "Why not just claim that an encrypted message is data?",
> but my original point was Plausible Deniability. That is, I was
> postulating an environment in which Big Brother has outlawed cryptography.
> Now, confronted with a confiscated message, the sender has to defend
> himself from the Inquisition. Can't just claim it's a sound file;
> the Inquisitor will want it played. The question I'm trying to answer
So I say, "Damn! CRC Error! Must be a bad disk. Well, no point in keeping
THIS sitting around."
> is how to produce on demand a causal explanation of data (which actually
> contains an encrypted message) that satisfies an investigator and
> doesn't reveal the encrypted message. Some simple scheme like, "Uh,
I understand what you want. Wish I understood how to do it. ;^)
> it's the result of my new random number generation algorithm" isn't
> likely to be *satisfying* and is certain to produce the response,
> "OK, let's see the algorithm."
+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------+
| J. Michael Diehl ;-) | I thought I was wrong once. But, I was mistaken. |
| +----------------------------------------------------+
| mdiehl@triton.unm.edu| "I'm just looking for the opportunity to be |
| Thunder@forum | Politically Incorrect! |
| (505) 299-2282 | <me> |
+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------+
Return to March 1993
Return to “uri@watson.ibm.com”