1993-03-09 - Re: zip version for pgp2.2?

Header Data

From: David L Racette <dlr@world.std.com>
To: Pat Farrell <pfarrell@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>
Message Hash: 7ef4c51df376b70e02f354d7cdcaea699fcc5b00f7c624ace61076bc5dc1347c
Message ID: <Pine.3.05.9303090855.A25654-a100000@world.std.com>
Reply To: <9303091335.AA21039@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-09 14:05:56 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Mar 93 06:05:56 PST

Raw message

From: David L Racette <dlr@world.std.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 93 06:05:56 PST
To: Pat Farrell <pfarrell@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>
Subject: Re: zip version for pgp2.2?
In-Reply-To: <9303091335.AA21039@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.05.9303090855.A25654-a100000@world.std.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, 9 Mar 1993, Pat Farrell wrote:

> I just downloaded pgp22.zip from soda, and pkunzip complains about every
> file having a bad checksum. I'm still using pkunzip 1.1, and I know
> that pgp20 had problems with some versions of pkunzip. Do I need
> to get pkunzip 2.04g?
> Thanks
> Pat

I dnloaded pgp22.zip from soda and used pkunzip 2.04g to decompress it
without a hitch. Looks like it might be your version of pkzip. Of course
if you didn't use binary for the ftp that would mess it up also.