From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
To: “Bill_Stewart(HOY002” <wcs@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message Hash: 9db978d35c12e236f49279150809154467ab45ae264cbd830c078553630ba777
Message ID: <9303011245.aa09219@penet.penet.FI>
Reply To: <9303010139.AA15551@anchor.ho.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-01 11:57:24 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:57:24 PST
From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 93 03:57:24 PST
To: "Bill_Stewart(HOY002" <wcs@anchor.ho.att.com>
Subject: Re: dispatches from the front lines of anonymity
In-Reply-To: <9303010139.AA15551@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <9303011245.aa09219@penet.penet.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> A clean way to avoid the problem of encrypted replies cluttering up the
> newsgroup is to also create alt.whistleblower.followup or a.w.crypt,
> with similar non-assignment of ids, so readers can easily skip over
> the crypted private replies.
Good idea! Will implement!
> I *would* recommend the following policies -
> - accept email in PGP, RIPEM, and also unencrypted MIME, X.400, and vanilla
> formats- not everybody who wants to blow a whistle has the right-shaped
> whistle handy.
Yes.
Julf
Return to March 1993
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (Bill_Stewart(HOY002)1305)”