From: pete@cirrus.com (Pete Carpenter)
To: grady@public.btr.com
Message Hash: aa95b75d2330d21b40037e739cbdc31a541160de98fa277723752188590f184b
Message ID: <9303262028.AA11335@ss2138.cirrus.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-26 20:51:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 12:51:45 PST
From: pete@cirrus.com (Pete Carpenter)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 12:51:45 PST
To: grady@public.btr.com
Subject: Re: TEMPEST in a teapot
Message-ID: <9303262028.AA11335@ss2138.cirrus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
----- Begin Included Message -----
It is speculated that poorly protected systems can
be effectively monitored up to the order of one kilometer from the target
equipment.
----- End Included Message -----
The "readability" of the relatively high energy sweeps in a standard CRT monitor
is well known. Any idea of similar effects on LCD screens ? The energy involved
would be orders of magnitude less, just for starters. Also, since the whole screen
is effectively oscillating, I'm not sure that there is any 'raster' sweep per se
going on here at all. This could be a factor for the truly paranoid :-) using
portables with LCD screens.
Pete Carpenter pete@cirrus.com
Talk about your plenty, talk about your ills,
One man gathers what another man spills. - Robert Hunter
Return to March 1993
Return to “pete@cirrus.com (Pete Carpenter)”
1993-03-26 (Fri, 26 Mar 93 12:51:45 PST) - Re: TEMPEST in a teapot - pete@cirrus.com (Pete Carpenter)