From: thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bd16243c72568214376910d6d3e9505333d749e47ff1a64408e36d0f38b8e14b
Message ID: <m0nTghU-000jqOC@phantom.com>
Reply To: <199303022252.AA14712@ra.cs.umb.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-02 23:56:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 15:56:52 PST
From: thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 15:56:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Textual analysis
In-Reply-To: <199303022252.AA14712@ra.cs.umb.edu>
Message-ID: <m0nTghU-000jqOC@phantom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Tim May writes:
>Imagine what can be done with word and phrase frequency analysis, with
>examination of punctuation styles (e.g., some people use _this_ for
>emphasis while others use *this*), and so on. Entropy measures, etc.
I believe that such programs already exist. They are used to identify
unknown authors of famous documents. I believe some of Shakespeare's
work was under close scrutiny a number of years ago, as were the
Fedaralist papers.
There was an article in Byte about three or four years ago all about
this kind of technology.
Thug
Return to March 1993
Return to “thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)”