From: baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c43241222c2d3e80d28108fe36bff3df817776731c761da01e3cdf1926a7350a
Message ID: <9303291843.AA08556@walrus.chp.atmel.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-29 16:50:32 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Mar 93 08:50:32 PST
From: baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 93 08:50:32 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP Secure?
Message-ID: <9303291843.AA08556@walrus.chp.atmel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> This has been recently hashed over in sci.crypt. Here are a few
> generalities, read the articles in sci.crypt for the real numbers.
For those of us who don't have access to USENET, is there a mailing-list
that echo's it's content and allows posting?
> -If you did 1000 attempts to break a 1024 bit RSA key every second
> and started your calculations at the beginning of the universe, you
> would still have several trillion years to go.
> -If you stored every attempted key in a single atom, you would run
> out of atoms in the universe long before you ran out of keys.
Couldn't this argument also be made about a simple substitution code?
How secure is PGP with current smarter attacks?
Peter Baumbach
baumbach@atmel.com
Return to March 1993
Return to “baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)”
1993-03-29 (Mon, 29 Mar 93 08:50:32 PST) - Re: PGP Secure? - baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)