From: fen@genmagic.genmagic.com (Fen Labalme)
To: think@oracle.com
Message Hash: fcd5cc382b5b8c40088ab041920a28cd591e87410927db2fae2f365562ad85a1
Message ID: <9303090251.AA15257@>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-09 02:52:19 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Mar 93 18:52:19 PST
From: fen@genmagic.genmagic.com (Fen Labalme)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 93 18:52:19 PST
To: think@oracle.com
Subject: Fwd: cyberspace, congressional hearings
Message-ID: <9303090251.AA15257@>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1993 17:51:38 -0800
> From: Bruce Smith <bruce@wri.com>
> Subject: cyberspace, congressional hearings
The following is quoted/paraphrased from a column by Brian Robinson on page 26
of the 1 March 93 Electronic Engineering Times. By passing it on I imply no
specific attitude of my own. I don't know the date of the hearings, but if
someone finds out if/when it will be viewable on C-Span, I'd like to know.
Feel free to pass the following info to individuals, mailing lists, or
newsgroups.
---
The House Telecommunications Subcommittee, chaired by Edward Markey (D-Mass),
will soon be holding hearings on the relationship of future communications
technologies to modern culture. In particular, it will be looking at the
not-so-far-off universe of cyberspace. Some of the issues the panel will be
considering are (in Markey's own words):
+ Are the fundamental values of our society so universal and enduring that they
will not be threatened by the advent of new technologies or any new subcultures
such technologies produce?
+ Will cyberspace instead become some lawless place, where the Constitution is
cracked open by fiber fissures created when trying to convert a 200-year-old
parchment document into a binary world of 0s and 1s? Can it continue to be a
"living, breathing document"?
+ Will cyberspace develop its own distinct laws? Will it develop "digital
vigilantes" to patrol and police the electronic bulletin boards and electronic
highways?
Return to March 1993
Return to “jla@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Joseph Arceneaux)”