1993-04-29 - Limbaugh & Liddy

Header Data

From: Xiao Zhou <XIAOZHOU@pucc.Princeton.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 08071d978d3e50c3d0d1945307a296b71edaf6b69cf4855ab22b6e907d2252d9
Message ID: <9304291640.AA15355@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-29 16:41:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 09:41:01 PDT

Raw message

From: Xiao Zhou <XIAOZHOU@pucc.Princeton.EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 09:41:01 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Limbaugh & Liddy
Message-ID: <9304291640.AA15355@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>> In <9304231457.AA22562@gmuvax2.gmu.edu>, 7025aj@gmuvax2.gmu.edu writes:
>> |>
>> |> send him [Limbaug] some convincing words, please?
>> |>
>> |> G. Gordon Liddy would be another good target, but I don't know his address
>
>cp@jido.b30.ingr.com (Serrzna Penvt Cerffba) [!Is that real rot13!?] replies:
>> My guess would be that Liddy and Limbaugh would both be very
>> happy about the Tapper chip proposal...

1) Any publicity is good for us. These guys need controversy, and we've got it.

2) There's the 'international competitiveness' issue.

3) These guys hate Clinton to Schiminton.

4) Even if they pick the other side, we look good.

5) Larry King would of course be better, but is he returning your calls?





Thread