1993-04-18 - Returned mail: User unknown

Header Data

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@Panix.Com>
To: habs@Panix.Com
Message Hash: 1e7e82f7adaf3f4552600590b71896a4dadcee096c125004fe535709c237e6a3
Message ID: <199304172211.AA00916@sun.Panix.Com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-18 03:29:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Apr 93 20:29:11 PDT

Raw message

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@Panix.Com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 93 20:29:11 PDT
To: habs@Panix.Com
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Message-ID: <199304172211.AA00916@sun.Panix.Com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
While talking to toad.com:
>>> RCPT To:<cyhperpunks@toad.com>
<<< 550 <cyhperpunks@toad.com>... User unknown
550 cyhperpunks@toad.com... User unknown

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA00914
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for cyhperpunks@toad.com); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 18:11:23 -0400
Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA29602
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for habs); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Message-Id: <199304172142.AA29602@sun.Panix.Com>
To: habs
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Sender: habs

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
While talking to toad.com:
>>> RCPT To:<cypherpunk@toad.com>
<<< 550 <cypherpunk@toad.com>... User unknown
550 cypherpunk@toad.com... User unknown

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA29600
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for extropians@gnu.ai.mit.edu); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400
From: Harry Shapiro <habs>
Message-Id: <199304172142.AA29600@sun.Panix.Com>
Subject: PGP & RSA -> Legal
To: cypherpunk@toad.com, extropians@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Harry Shapiro)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: habs
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 698       

I recall at some point that RSA put something out on the net
which allowed anyone to use the "patents or source code" for
non-commercial use.

Do I remember correctly? (I replied to the announcement)

If I am remembering correctly, would that give me a defacto
licensing of PGP for con-commercial use?

The reason I bring this up is that if the feds crack down,
they many decide to "help" RSA by legally fighting PGP users.

Which why it would be in our interest to legally (patent-wise,
despite how you feel about RSA, etc.) use PGP.

-- 
Harry Shapiro  				      habs@panix.com
List Administrator of the Extropy Institute Mailing List
Private Communication for the Extropian Community since 1991









Thread