1993-04-20 - Re: Wiretapping chip: vid clips & sound bites

Header Data

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 214dc82473f0114acd2c7e6cf2c99f516079c91c0f5cc5c4a2de11969c067561
Message ID: <9304201734.AA09381@anchor.ho.att.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-20 17:35:05 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Apr 93 10:35:05 PDT

Raw message

From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 93 10:35:05 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Wiretapping chip: vid clips & sound bites
Message-ID: <9304201734.AA09381@anchor.ho.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



I strongly agree with Ray Cromwell's suggestions that we consistently
refer to "the wiretap chip", and avoid "drug dealer" examples.
One that might be closer to home when you need an example is
	   "Suppose the IRS thinks you may have cheated on your income tax
	   and decides they want to wiretap your phone ..."

It's within the range of things people imagine could happen to them,
and it makes the point that it's *their* phone that's being trapped,
not some public enemy bogeyman.  Making it personal is important...

		   Bill 
# Bill Stewart    wcs@anchor.ho.att.com  +1-908-949-0705 Fax-4876
# AT&T Bell Labs, Room 4M-312, Crawfords Corner Rd, Holmdel, NJ  07733-3030





Thread