From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
To: hughes@soda.berkeley.edu
Message Hash: 580f81062f6b3781d23b1bdfc973ec04a64e8b7946b7dca5859b60344cf5b749
Message ID: <9304130636.AA27437@servo>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-13 06:36:15 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Apr 93 23:36:15 PDT
From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 93 23:36:15 PDT
To: hughes@soda.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: FWEE!: kiosks
Message-ID: <9304130636.AA27437@servo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Eric's comment about the complementary natures of a public kiosk and
a person's home suggests a hybrid whistleblowing scheme that combines
the best of both. The whistleblower creates his file in the privacy
of his own home on a floppy disk, encrypts it in the public key of
the whistleblowing system, and carries it to a public kiosk where he
sends it.
This gives the whistleblower plenty of time and quite a bit of privacy
as he composes his message (unless the PTB have bugged his home
computer, a possibility for a suspected repeat "offender"). The
step of physically carrying his file to the kiosk eliminates anything
that could be done to the whistleblower's phone (including traffic
analysis), although it would not stop physical surveillance of the
whistleblower.
And if the whistleblower is accosted on his way to the kiosk, all they
could seize would be the ciphertext of his message, encrypted in the
public key of the whistleblowing service -- which the whistleblower
himself would not be able to decrypt even if he wanted to.
Think of the kiosk more as a public mailbox than a public phone.
Phil
Return to April 1993
Return to “karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)”