From: szabo@techbook.com (Nick Szabo)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 93 16:27:48 PDT
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Subject: Re: WIRETAP: boycotts
In-Reply-To: <9304222221.AA01871@servo>
Message-ID: <m0nmAik-000hxoC@techbook.techbook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Agreed, not much economic pressure would come from directly boycotting 
Clipper phones, or for that matter from people boycotting AT&T for 
ideological reasons.  Rather, it would come from AT&T getting a reputation
as putting the U.S. government's needs before the needs of their customers;
and not caring very much about the privacy of their customers' phone
calls.  What international business, law firm, etc. wants to trust
their communications to a company that puts NSA wiretap chips in their 
phones and touts them as "secure"?  A good outcome here is for this fiasco 
to get wide publicity, and for Sprint, MCI, etc. to subtly use doubts about 
AT&T's concern for privacy in their ad campaigns.

A recent cypherpunks post refferred to a conversation with an AT&T
marketing type, who kept insisting that AT&T is very concerned about
customer privacy, it's a high priority, etc.  AT&T knows they need a 
good reputation for privacy.  Keep up the pressure!

Nick Szabo					szabo@techbook.com