From: geoffw@nexsys.net (Geoff White)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7636dcb3c733baa7d5aee476d05d391d6da33aacdf0954a476bc6caeed78575e
Message ID: <9304301505.AA07803@nexsys.nexsys.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-30 15:14:05 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 30 Apr 93 08:14:05 PDT
From: geoffw@nexsys.net (Geoff White)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 93 08:14:05 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security
Message-ID: <9304301505.AA07803@nexsys.nexsys.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Maybe this is a solution...
A core group of us coders take on the task of merging PGP
functionality into MailSafe, we do the work for nominal cost
or for free, this new version of MailSafe can become REALLY
slick and worth paying the $125 or what-ever he is charging
for it, AND it will be PGP compatable. We them retrofit
PGP to use RSA's RSAREF or whatever else it takes to bring
PGP into complience and PGP stays FREE, and unsupported, we
suspend further development and make it sort of like a demo
program or freeware, but if you want the really seemless UI
you buy the product, Bidzos gets money, we get to deploy a
program that educates the masses about the use of strong
crypto, and since they are compatible, the use of the freeware
can't help but encourage the use of the "product". The bottom
line is that strong crypto is made available to the public,
This solution might require that a few egos deflate a bit but
I'm sure a varient of this could work.
Return to April 1993
Return to “geoffw@nexsys.net (Geoff White)”
1993-04-30 (Fri, 30 Apr 93 08:14:05 PDT) - Re: Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security - geoffw@nexsys.net (Geoff White)