1993-04-29 - Re: Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security

Header Data

From: Sy Verpunc <svp@gtoal.com>
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a9679300491d8559dd5a0516c457a675742edef5718c09eb757e404ef9f281f6
Message ID: <9304281433.AA05674@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-29 14:24:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 07:24:09 PDT

Raw message

From: Sy Verpunc <svp@gtoal.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 07:24:09 PDT
To: Cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security
Message-ID: <9304281433.AA05674@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


: At risk of getting the goats of some friends of mine who read the list, I'm
: tending to agree with Tim's ideas here.  Brief conversation with Jim Bidzos
: at the cypunx mtg indicated that he is very much up for something along the
: lines of a personal encryption product that would meet our needs.  From a

All he has to do is let us pay a licence fee for pgp.  What's the advantage
to him in asking for a different piece of code that uses RSAREF and DES
instead of Phil's code and IDEA?  I can't see it, except that using DES
blows away the security of the program...

No, I think this suggestion should be put down now, or we'll splinter and
give them exactly the divide-and-conquer opening they're looking for.

G





Thread