From: Clark Reynard <clark@metal.psu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: acd08cbef2df7d3dfe15984c03b46026fec8dde0fe302b42249a7a37009890f8
Message ID: <9304140125.AA16266@metal.psu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-14 00:28:43 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Apr 93 17:28:43 PDT
From: Clark Reynard <clark@metal.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 93 17:28:43 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: alt.whistleblowers
Message-ID: <9304140125.AA16266@metal.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I suggest that as a first step in the process of making alt.whistleblowers
a reality, that we kick around the idea for a while, either here
or on alt.config. If I receive a positive response, I will
post the control message myself.
Three possible choices of action:
1) Kick it around on alt.config.
2) Kick it around on news.groups, etc.
3) Kick it around here.
4) Don't even bother kicking it around; just create the group,
and hell with anyone who doesn't like it.
So, what's the general consensus on the best course of action?
And, yes, I know that was four, and not three possible choices;
it's probably really eight or ten.
----
Robert W. Clark
rclark@nyx.cs.du.edu PGP signature available by mail or finger
Return to April 1993
Return to “mark@coombs.anu.edu.au (Mark)”