From: grady@netcom.com (1016/2EF221)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: af15388aaa70ceead69aa654d70330d1236fe2ea9fcec359c0b8770172b9d200
Message ID: <9304231610.AA03624@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-23 16:10:40 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 Apr 93 09:10:40 PDT
From: grady@netcom.com (1016/2EF221)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 93 09:10:40 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: radio fingerprinting
Message-ID: <9304231610.AA03624@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
As N1KGX (William S. Yerazuni of Marloboro MA)
points out, echanging PGP fingerprints rather
than encrypting messages is completely permitted by
FCC regulations (97.113 in particular).
Also, amateurs particpating in tomorrow's net
are reminded of the callsign server
telnet callsign.cs.buffalo.edu 2000
in case their radios are near their net links...
you can verify fingerprint, name, call, address,
phone, or whatever coevally.
Saturday 4/23/93 at 17:00 UTC
> (10 am PDT). I'd like to contact as many
> of you as possible from my modest station
> in Humboldt County California.
>
> For Bay area people, let's try 7265 Mhz;
> for people elsewhere in the United States and
> elsewhere in the world, conditons permitting,
> how about 14.335 at 17:30 UTC. +-for QRM?
73 de KD6ETH/KN6CP Grady Ward
Return to April 1993
Return to “grady@netcom.com (1016/2EF221)”
1993-04-23 (Fri, 23 Apr 93 09:10:40 PDT) - radio fingerprinting - grady@netcom.com (1016/2EF221)