From: Bob Stratton <strat@intercon.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d3dd17b8a0518f8d2cdc3c9b5255aff3eb7240b66b9f5d1d04a79ab1c7911af8
Message ID: <9304291350.AA43154@horton.intercon.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-04-29 18:50:53 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 11:50:53 PDT
From: Bob Stratton <strat@intercon.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 93 11:50:53 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security
Message-ID: <9304291350.AA43154@horton.intercon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> From: markh@wimsey.bc.ca (Mark C. Henderson)
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1993 11:11:20 PDT
> Subject: Re: Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security
>
>
> 6. RIPEM currently has no way to handle certificates or sign other
> people's public keys. This is, of course, serious.
The Macintosh RIPEM client does/will have certificate creation functionality
RSN. In fact, RSA's even running a low-security persona certification
authority that interoperates with them, as we speak.
--Strat
Return to April 1993
Return to “Bob Stratton <strat@intercon.com>”
1993-04-29 (Thu, 29 Apr 93 11:50:53 PDT) - Re: Tough Choices: PGP vs. RSA Data Security - Bob Stratton <strat@intercon.com>