From: jthomas@kolanut.mitre.org (Joe Thomas)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 159aea3a12128d6929cf877cb3a66973cb6cddb75983b006a468986a1a0c8221
Message ID: <9305261949.AA07621@kolanut>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-26 19:49:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 May 93 12:49:49 PDT
From: jthomas@kolanut.mitre.org (Joe Thomas)
Date: Wed, 26 May 93 12:49:49 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Just the facts, ma'am.
Message-ID: <9305261949.AA07621@kolanut>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: composer@beyond.dreams.org (Jeff Kellem)
>
> On the cypherpunks mailing list, Strat wrote...
> > Rarely will you find a system administration staff more concerned with
> > your privacy that the guys at Digital Express Group. As I recall, the
> > set of username->real name mappings isn't even on machine readable media
> > on the system.
>
> Really? That's odd, especially for a unix box, which access.digex.com
> seems to be. And, as a matter of fact, it does seem to show "Robert
> Stratton" for the username of "strat". So, it seems they do maintain
> username to "real name" mappings (even if they allow the user to change
> the "real name" listed.
Digital Express doesn't require that the GECOS field of /etc/passwd contain
real names, although they obviously allow it. (Finger
jthomas@access.digex.net for my full name, as well as my PGP key :^)
I seem to remember that the new user signup script they use explicitly gives
you the option of signing up under a pseudonymn, although they'll check up on
you by phone if you do (and presumably write your name in the Big Book at that
point). I've seen quite a few public access Unix sites advertising
"anonymous" accounts lately, especially after Julf's server went down.
Joe
Return to May 1993
Return to “jthomas@kolanut.mitre.org (Joe Thomas)”
1993-05-26 (Wed, 26 May 93 12:49:49 PDT) - Re: Just the facts, ma’am. - jthomas@kolanut.mitre.org (Joe Thomas)