1993-05-21 - Ref Strong Encryption

Header Data

From: “Clive” <walmsley@ccint1.rsre.mod.uk>
To: “cypherpunks” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 176d77fd95568d937334c1ba945f5a7683815ae9adaec33af2dc74dfa4fbe8d9
Message ID: <9305211551.AA22478@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-21 15:51:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 May 93 08:51:48 PDT

Raw message

From: "Clive" <walmsley@ccint1.rsre.mod.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 May 93 08:51:48 PDT
To: "cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Ref Strong Encryption
Message-ID: <9305211551.AA22478@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Hi,

am I missing something ....

From: baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)

>> It seems that an easely available (legal) software verification system
>> needs to be made.  If one were widely used, virus worries of people
>> could be channeled into a demand for strong encryption.  Tell people
>> that the Crippler Chip might prevent this from ever happening.

How can the case be made for strong encryption, based upon the worries
of people over viruses???

I fail to see how the worries over viruses can be countered, channelled 
into the need for strong encryption. ???

Clive Walmsley
Walmsley@ccint1.rsre.mod.uk






Thread