From: Peter Honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
To: 76114.2307@CompuServe.COM
Message Hash: 811abc6bc3fe4c60bfb1ff71ec4fb511dff895a4d8c4b4cbc67b2310e7accab8
Message ID: <9305031301.AA22009@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-03 13:01:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 May 93 06:01:06 PDT
From: Peter Honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 May 93 06:01:06 PDT
To: 76114.2307@CompuServe.COM
Subject: Re: A LEGAL way---maybe!
Message-ID: <9305031301.AA22009@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
perhaps you missed my note last week, where i cited:
%T patents and the progress of science: exclusive rights and experimental use
%A rebecca s. eisenberg
%J university of chicago law review
%V 56
%N 3
%D summer 1989
%P 1017-1086
follow the footnotes. here's a quote to entice you:
If basic research cannot be insulated from the patent system entirely, it
might still be possible to reconcile a system of exclusive patent rights in
prior discoveries with the interest of the scientific community in allowing
subsequent researchers to enjoy free access to such discoveries by exempting
the use of patented inventions in research from infringement liability.
While the United States patent statute does not provide for such an
exemption, the courts have long recognized, at least in principle, that a
purely "experimental use" of a patented invention, with no commercial
purpose, should be exempt from infringement liability.
over and over, she reiterates that patent courts have consistently
recognized the experimental use defense.
peter
Return to May 1993
Return to “peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>”