From: “Thomas W. Strong, Jr.” <strong+@cmu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 828dacc71d62bc3f9c14212f6b246e713faa3fac0b049a34aa580630ad74bdfe
Message ID: <Qg2Jf3S00VpN4ILYG@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-31 00:32:36 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 30 May 93 17:32:36 PDT
From: "Thomas W. Strong, Jr." <strong+@cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 May 93 17:32:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: An editorial comment from comp.risks
Message-ID: <Qg2Jf3S00VpN4_ILYG@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In an article about the absurdity of ITAR legislation, Peter Neuman (the
moderator) added this comment at the bottom.
> [Incidentally, at last week's IEEE Symposium on Research in Security
> and Privacy, a rump group decided that because crypto falls under
> munitions controls, the right to bear arms must sanction private uses of
> cryptography! PGN]
Does anyone here have any more information about this? Particularly
whether or not it can be backed up?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Strong N3NBB ts49+@andrew.cmu.edu
Return to May 1993
Return to ““Thomas W. Strong, Jr.” <strong+@cmu.edu>”
1993-05-31 (Sun, 30 May 93 17:32:36 PDT) - An editorial comment from comp.risks - “Thomas W. Strong, Jr.” <strong+@cmu.edu>