1993-05-01 - Re: A legal way to use RSA!

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@Athena.MIT.EDU>
To: William Oldacre <76114.2307@CompuServe.COM>
Message Hash: c6015d8ad7ccc1728a885de70996c9a681ac6a6f24a55ed34ed4bacea7a33015
Message ID: <9305012123.AA17107@podge>
Reply To: <930501180040_76114.2307_BHA70-1@CompuServe.COM>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-01 21:23:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 May 93 14:23:48 PDT

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@Athena.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 1 May 93 14:23:48 PDT
To: William Oldacre <76114.2307@CompuServe.COM>
Subject: Re: A legal way to use RSA!
In-Reply-To: <930501180040_76114.2307_BHA70-1@CompuServe.COM>
Message-ID: <9305012123.AA17107@podge>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Once in court, it will make the newspapers.  A private company 
> profiteering from something the taxpayers paid for

Uhh, I hate to inform you, but this was discussed back in the Congress
in the 1960's.  It was decided, then, that patents COULD be obtained
fromm research done using gov't funding.  Therefore, this is nothing
new.  In fact, I doubt a paper would even touch this "scoop"...

As to whether or no I agree with this, well, thats a different topic.
(I happen to believe that patents on algorithms are stupid, but that's
besides the point).  In other words, there was nothing illegal in the
RSA patent, even if there was gov't funding....

-derek






Thread