1993-05-19 - Re: MCI, Sprint or bust …
Header Data
From: peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cff83a4f6c0f82e936655300ac22d5ba239c55aa5c7c2f4c32f280de5249bac1
Message ID: <9305191444.AA01544@toad.com>
Reply To: <NXss4B1w165w@sytex.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-19 14:44:07 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 19 May 93 07:44:07 PDT
Raw message
From: peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 May 93 07:44:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: MCI, Sprint or bust ...
In-Reply-To: <NXss4B1w165w@sytex.com>
Message-ID: <9305191444.AA01544@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
i think it's naive to boycott at&t over clipper. i'm sure mci and
sprint are the same sort of villains as at&t.
what makes more sense is to buy some at&t shares and force the issue
at the next stockholders' meeting. in fact, this might be a great
consciousness-raising vehicle: we could get a statement included
in the proxy booklet and force a stockholder vote. as a stockholder
(of about 20 shares, due to my previous life as a bell labs mts), i
see cranks getting space in the booklet every year.
how do they do that?
peter
Thread
Return to May 1993
- Return to “fergp@sytex.com (Paul Ferguson)”
- Return to “Paco Xander Nathan <wixer!wixer.bga.com!pacoid@cactus.org>”
- Return to “peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>”
Return to “Stanton McCandlish <anton@hydra.unm.edu>”
- 1993-05-19 (Wed, 19 May 93 06:45:12 PDT) - MCI, Sprint or bust … - fergp@sytex.com (Paul Ferguson)
- 1993-05-19 (Wed, 19 May 93 07:21:03 PDT) - Re: MCI, Sprint or bust … - Stanton McCandlish <anton@hydra.unm.edu>
- 1993-05-19 (Wed, 19 May 93 07:44:07 PDT) - Re: MCI, Sprint or bust … - peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
- 1993-05-20 (Thu, 20 May 93 12:11:48 PDT) - Re: MCI, Sprint or bust … - Paco Xander Nathan <wixer!wixer.bga.com!pacoid@cactus.org>