From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d8f0c76df49d821141ce66a7a824bc400612142ffdab55d2e3547b54b9acd721
Message ID: <9305010729.AA14153@toad.com>
Reply To: <9304300628.AA17668@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-01 07:29:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 May 93 00:29:16 PDT
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Sat, 1 May 93 00:29:16 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: validity of the RSA patent
In-Reply-To: <9304300628.AA17668@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9305010729.AA14153@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Consider use of another public key encryption scheme, say LUC encryption.
Which, of course, is patent-pending. It appears that we can no more
make progress in cryptography in the face of algorithm patents than
we could advance mathematics under the burden of theorem licensing.
We can't afford to wait until 2001.
> Eric
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
(LPF member)
Return to May 1993
Return to “Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>”