From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: da3751d52cf070a77229888b182b47062abe24bedfbaabb29e8ef7cfaf912fe0
Message ID: <9305262325.AA05097@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9305262158.AA28845@muskwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-26 23:29:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 26 May 93 16:29:12 PDT
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 May 93 16:29:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Digital cash issuess...
In-Reply-To: <9305262158.AA28845@muskwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>
Message-ID: <9305262325.AA05097@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>As a consequence, our
>cash system is much more efficient in both computation and
>communication complexity than previously proposed systems."
I take this with a grain of salt; see below.
>In our opinion, the most interesting of
>these is that the entire cash system (including all the extensions)
>can be incorporated straightforwardly in a setting based on wallets
>with observers,
I am not surprised that they find this interesting; David Chaum has
patented all the observer protocols.
Having read these protocols in the original, I can say this is not
much of an advantage. The observer protocols are tremendously
expensive computationally. Anything you build on top of it won't be
any faster.
Eric
Return to May 1993
Return to “sneal@muskwa.ucs.ualberta.ca (Sneal)”