From: Brian.Hawthorne@East.Sun.COM (Brian Holt Hawthorne - SunSelect Engineering)
To: peb@PROCASE.COM
Message Hash: e504cbc731fb73e447a1ada6a86b886987d5becdff40fc72af4d9043c6babfbe
Message ID: <9305122045.AA01782@sea.East.Sun.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-12 20:48:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 May 93 13:48:44 PDT
From: Brian.Hawthorne@East.Sun.COM (Brian Holt Hawthorne - SunSelect Engineering)
Date: Wed, 12 May 93 13:48:44 PDT
To: peb@PROCASE.COM
Subject: Re: The Halting Problem
Message-ID: <9305122045.AA01782@sea.East.Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> The revelation here
> (for me, anyway) is that if arbitrary crypto were made illegal, the
> burden of proof would be on the prosecution which would have to crack
> the message (at least partially).
I believe the burden would actually be on them to crack the message
entirely. Otherwise, you are applying arbitrary algorithms to what may
be a random stream. If you get something comprehensible out, you have
either partially cracked the message, or run into the British Museum
problem (AKA 100 monkeys with typewriters).
Return to May 1993
Return to “Marc Horowitz <marc@GZA.COM>”