From: Sandy <72114.1712@CompuServe.COM>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: e9351e9207b3a3a2f0fed842e180952eeb3c2f66c9b1edf9bf510cb22a10ca51
Message ID: <93053017111172114.1712_FHF43-1@CompuServe.COM>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-30 16:39:23 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 30 May 93 09:39:23 PDT
From: Sandy <72114.1712@CompuServe.COM>
Date: Sun, 30 May 93 09:39:23 PDT
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: >>>>>s
Message-ID: <930530171111_72114.1712_FHF43-1@CompuServe.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
_________________________________________________________________
SANDY SANDFORT ssandfort@attmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
George A. Gleason wrote:
" . . . So in summary, what d' y'all think of trying to
cut down on the swarms of >>>>>>>>>>> lengthy
full-paragraph quotes and replace them with something a
bit more compact, eh...?"
Like that, George?
You know folks, George is right. It isn't necessary, however, to
re-invent the wheel. Literary conventions for text presentation
have existed for decades--if not centuries. "NetSpeak" can be oh
so clever, but often, it's not very conducive to communication.
Almost everyone on this list took English in school (-especially-
those NOT educated in the US). If you don't remember your
English grammar, spelling or style; buy some books. (Or as we
say in NetSpeak, "RTFM"!)
RELATED GRIPE: For all the excessive IQ on this list, I see lots
of poor reading skills. As an example, I don't know how many of
you have sent responses to me at my CompuServe address, even
though I clearly request otherwise at the end of every one of my
posts. (Didn't you get that far?)
Often, I see responses to posts that focus on what the reader
-thought- was said, rather than what was -actually- said. Before
you go shooting from the hip, be sure you are responding to more
than just some emotionally loaded key words. Also, I'm sure not
all of you read -your own- posts before you launch them into
Cyberspace.
S a n d y
P.S. Some of you may think this is not a relevant topic for
Cypherpunks. If so, I suggest you think again. I leave the
proof of relevance as an exercise for the student.
>>>>>> Please address e-mail to: ssandfort@attmail.com <<<<<<
_________________________________________________________________
Return to May 1993
Return to “Sandy <72114.1712@CompuServe.COM>”
1993-05-30 (Sun, 30 May 93 09:39:23 PDT) - »»>s - Sandy <72114.1712@CompuServe.COM>