From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 14cc8a3c0e94a7938866a4ca74dce5a54cadc78247594d6033d8ee89a1b745bc
Message ID: <9306040101.AA05981@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9306030216.1.2999@cup.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-04 01:05:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Jun 93 18:05:09 PDT
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 93 18:05:09 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Hardware vs software
In-Reply-To: <9306030216.1.2999@cup.portal.com>
Message-ID: <9306040101.AA05981@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>DES is kind of optimised for doing it in hardware, so don't take
>how slow it is in software as the limit for good encryption.
I wasn't saying that DES was the fastest of all possible secure
ciphers. I was saying that DES is the fastest of all ciphers which
are widely believed to be secure. This aspect of security is
moderated by the key length of DES, which is too short to be secure
against a well-funded opponent at present, but which is perfectly
adequate for other purposes.
Eric
Return to June 1993
Return to “hkhenson@cup.portal.com”