From: “George A. Gleason” <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
To: rclark@nyx.cs.du.edu
Message Hash: 3cd8b9982a63aa554e18a6d7d96389d8b0fd616be41f96ba65d164bade829f66
Message ID: <93Jun22.030907pdt.13994-2@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-22 10:09:37 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 03:09:37 PDT
From: "George A. Gleason" <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 03:09:37 PDT
To: rclark@nyx.cs.du.edu
Subject: Re: The Bizdos flap
Message-ID: <93Jun22.030907pdt.13994-2@well.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Quoting you, "If one wishes PKP to behave "ethically," it is necessary for
us
to make it unprofitable for PKP to behave in the manner in which
it is. E. g. question their patents, bring suits against them,
and otherwise make PKP's existence unprofitable. Suddenly, it
will behave "ethically."
That's like, if you want your kid to behave, beat him any time he
misbehaves. Yeah, uh-huh.
If we want PKP to behave ethically, we have to show them positive i.e.
profitmaking incentives for doing so. For instance commitments to buy their
products if they do (whatever).
-gg
Return to June 1993
Return to ““George A. Gleason” <gg@well.sf.ca.us>”
1993-06-22 (Tue, 22 Jun 93 03:09:37 PDT) - Re: The Bizdos flap - “George A. Gleason” <gg@well.sf.ca.us>