1993-06-17 - Contempt of court

Header Data

From: Duncan Frissell <76630.3577@CompuServe.COM>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 59d6cd1ac37b5ed982ba33519855057c980b424c75014ee2f8ea895b629ff77c
Message ID: <93061713290676630.3577_EHK27-1@CompuServe.COM>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1993-06-17 13:33:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Jun 93 06:33:17 PDT

Raw message

From: Duncan Frissell <76630.3577@CompuServe.COM>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 93 06:33:17 PDT
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Contempt of court
Message-ID: <930617132906_76630.3577_EHK27-1@CompuServe.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>>Note that a court could cite you for contempt for not complying
>>>with a subpoena duces tecum (a subpoena requiring you to produce objects
>>>or documents) if you fail to turn over subpoenaed backups.

Assume that your application is running (mirrored) on five machines in 
five different jurisdictions and the machines will lock out one or more 
of their number if they receive a panic code, or one goes offline 
unexpectedly, or is not accessed in exactly the right way, you could 
easily respond to a subpoena duces tecum by stating truthfully that the 
requested records are not (or are no longer) under your control.

The machines themselves can also be protected by careful choice of 
location and judicious use of remailers and requirements that they only 
be accessed by telenetting, etc.

Besides what's the big deal about contempt of court.  If you are worried 
about doing 2 years or less, locate yourself in another jurisdiction.  
No need to expose your body to high risk legal regimes.

Duncan Frissell

"But your Honor, I'm desperately trying to *conceal* my contempt for 
this court."







Thread