From: axelrod@s106.es.llnl.gov (Mike Axelrod 422-0929)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6088f0874a77e289a69fdb9ddeea6ea0bc5872a5231e20c2b91267f2162608c4
Message ID: <9306172113.AA24029@s106.es.llnl.gov>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-17 21:12:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Jun 93 14:12:07 PDT
From: axelrod@s106.es.llnl.gov (Mike Axelrod 422-0929)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 93 14:12:07 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Contempt of Court
Message-ID: <9306172113.AA24029@s106.es.llnl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
If the key itself had embedded testimony that was incriminating, then it is
possible one could invoke the 5th amendment to avoid disclosure of the key.
But, I suppose a court could do an end run around that by giving limited
use immunity for the incriminating content of the key. Comments?
Mike.
Return to June 1993
Return to “axelrod@s106.es.llnl.gov (Mike Axelrod 422-0929)”
1993-06-17 (Thu, 17 Jun 93 14:12:07 PDT) - Contempt of Court - axelrod@s106.es.llnl.gov (Mike Axelrod 422-0929)