From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Message Hash: 8596a387f68b13f5f32a4e21e6231a41d9837e7e9148093df331b59ee6d239fb
Message ID: <199306231511.AA11641@eff.org>
Reply To: <9306230705.AA22288@qualcomm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-23 15:10:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Jun 93 08:10:59 PDT
From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 93 08:10:59 PDT
To: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Subject: Re: YAA (yet another article)
In-Reply-To: <9306230705.AA22288@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <199306231511.AA11641@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Phil Karn writes:
> Do I sound like I don't place much faith in the warrant requirement acting
> as a meaningful safeguard? You bet!
I agree with Phil that, in practice, the warrant requirement is a very
thin reed on which to base our Fourth Amendment rights. The magistrates
who review warrant applications tend to accept uncritically what they're
told by the government officials seeking the warrant.
Hellman's proposal would address only the most obvious and most extreme
abuses.
--Mike
Return to June 1993
Return to “Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>”