1993-06-19 - Violation of 3rd Amendment

Header Data

From: starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 876398cdfd66bc7b409b7338bb49a4aca29e1aca2eeb52a865a898b7eea47a51
Message ID: <9306191011.aa09178@genie.genie.slhs.udel.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-19 10:15:34 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Jun 93 03:15:34 PDT

Raw message

From: starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 93 03:15:34 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Violation of 3rd Amendment
Message-ID: <9306191011.aa09178@genie.genie.slhs.udel.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I don't think it's correct to say that the 3rd amendment isn't violated.  If
you consider police forces standing armies and policemen soldiers, then the
cases of confiscation of private homes under civil forfeiture for the
occupation of cops constitutes violation of the 3rd amendment.  The problem
with this is that it takes some doing to persuade that police are standing
armies and cops soldiers by different names.

Tim Starr - Renaissance Now!

Assistant Editor: Freedom Network News, the newsletter of ISIL,
The International Society for Individual Liberty,
1800 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 864-0952; FAX: (415) 864-7506; 71034.2711@compuserve.com

Think Universally, Act Selfishly - starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu





Thread