From: bear@eagle.fsl.noaa.gov (Bear Giles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a3e81478a37381e1f4940e2d2a6273f3fe6d29be2be44c15751060864b3c9a0f
Message ID: <9306231547.AA13751@eagle.fsl.noaa.gov>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-23 15:50:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Jun 93 08:50:42 PDT
From: bear@eagle.fsl.noaa.gov (Bear Giles)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 93 08:50:42 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Digital Cash$$$$
Message-ID: <9306231547.AA13751@eagle.fsl.noaa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Phil Karn writes:
>
>Recall that the US has money-laundering laws that require you to file a
>form every time you move $10,000 or more in or out of the country. If the
>First Digital Bank of Cyberspace is offshore, it could come under these
>laws, at least with respect to priming your account with real money.
>
>It's an interesting question whether they could then get you for sending
>more than $10,000 of digital cash across the border without filing the
>form. It's even more interesting if you encrypt all these cross-border
>transactions...
This could tie a lawyer up in fits, because even if you sent digital
cash across the border, you could still produce a _spendable_ copy
in the originating country! In fact, you could have the same 'bill'
residing on media in a dozen countries!
You couldn't legally spend more than one copy of the digital cash,
of course, but digital cash (unlike hard cash) can be located in
several places -- and probably would be if you're talking about a
substantial amount of money.
>Another wonderful set of laws we can credit to the "war on drugs".
Many countries restrict or monitor the flow of currency across their
border; this isn't simply a result of the WoD. However, the WoD was
the main reason publicly acknowledged.
Bear Giles
Return to June 1993
Return to “Jim McCoy <mccoy@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu>”