1993-06-11 - No Subject

Header Data

From: XXCLARK@indst.indstate.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c33edfe66964cbb2623234ff9dbe89c129c06441b137104b9e1f46917fcf023a
Message ID: <9306112020.AA05923@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-11 20:20:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Jun 93 13:20:50 PDT

Raw message

From: XXCLARK@indst.indstate.edu
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 93 13:20:50 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <9306112020.AA05923@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




According to nobody@alumni.cco.caltech.edu:

> version 2.2 locks up 8088-based computers.  Version 2.1 does not.
> There is an unauthorized bug fix version, 2.21.  I use 2.2 as it

        PGP 2.2 runs without a hitch on at least one 10 MHz+ XT
  box in which the 8088 was replaced with an NEC V-20 and an 8087
  co-processor added when new... about six years ago.

        Probably far more XT boxes running, worldwide, than some
  are capable of imagining.

        Key generation on the XT is as exciting... and as fast...
  as a baseball game, but who generates new keys daily?

        Encryption speed is more than adequate.

         Not so high a brag-ability index as its companion box,
  a 486/66 EISA... but to use that machine for encryption seems
  an utter waste of processor power.

         `Course, if one can only afford a 486, I suppose one
  must make do as best one can...





Thread