1993-06-30 - Re: remailer ideas & proposals

Header Data

From: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
To: shipley@dis.org
Message Hash: d57661c1026348b17bb0e746a22b15ccb9355db6fef5ca3371792e3a3c96dec4
Message ID: <9306302300.AA14856@merde.dis.org>
Reply To: <9306300830.AA18466@bailey.cpac.washington.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-30 23:02:37 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Jun 93 16:02:37 PDT

Raw message

From: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 93 16:02:37 PDT
To: shipley@dis.org
Subject: Re: remailer ideas & proposals
In-Reply-To: <9306300830.AA18466@bailey.cpac.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <9306302300.AA14856@merde.dis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/x-pgp


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>
>MIME, in particular, solves this problem, along with many others.  Three cheers
>for Metamail!  Specifically, you can have several seperate messages within your
>RFC822 message, arranged hierarchially.  You could have your public key, your
>cute .sig, your message, your signature for the message, contact information
>for you, a JPEG image (of your cat, say), and a sound ("meow") all in the same
>mail message.  There is even faint hope that it would be portable.
>


it would be nice it remailers accepted MIME multipart messages then procesed
each separately thus I can "queue" up outgoing email into a single letter
to a remailer.   Another side is it a remailer would queue up mail whose
desination was another remailer and sent it a digest/MIME multipart format
thus making traffic analysis more more difficult.


                        -Pete




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3

iQBVAgUBLDIbGXynuL1gkffFAQE+2AH6A9l3QJiYHNie7Ch8aURSDjI1tWBegLms
FEf7ah+VsgNos+FotsMOryZYd0oN7KVD/1Mpk9SkrlXkF0PF7OPrjQ==
=z5pc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread