From: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: ea1fb84a86d2d6d11c42a4ac9b3921cf43b1c07afb64e1c06de29b22a7a2d8ee
Message ID: <9306112112.AA21861@merde.dis.org>
Reply To: <9306111802.AA17868@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-12 08:11:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 12 Jun 93 01:11:59 PDT
From: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 93 01:11:59 PDT
To: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: MAIL: logging that happens on soda
In-Reply-To: <9306111802.AA17868@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9306112112.AA21861@merde.dis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/x-pgp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>I raise this because it affects perceived remailer security and I have
>not once heard these specific logs brought up, on the list or in person.
>
it is also common practice for have the logs not readable for pople
not in the wheel or staff group.
As for this remailer security if you use multiple remailers with random
delays the ability to correlate the the sendmail & uucp logs should be
sufficient retarded. (this is assuming that you were able to get copies of
all the logs from sites the sendmail message passed through
-Pete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.2
iQBFAgUBLBj1HMhmn7GUWLLFAQFxQQF9ESltl2TTn1j8A9CNDsct+Mz7SzZqwsQe
w8H7ILI3mbCF8FVqmkuWNjPeHDe5C3xj
=h1r8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to June 1993
Return to “Peter Shipley <shipley@tfs.COM>”