1993-06-22 - Re: hardware RNG

Header Data

From: gnu (John Gilmore)
To: Douglas Sinclair <dsinclai@acs.ucalgary.ca>
Message Hash: fc2f2b0bd807164ec8f683cc2e308d5d36a42a8da531d3f6d45805bb8462a3fd
Message ID: <9306220859.AA01020@toad.com>
Reply To: <9306220012.AA37450@acs1.acs.ucalgary.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-22 09:00:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 02:00:04 PDT

Raw message

From: gnu (John Gilmore)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 93 02:00:04 PDT
To: Douglas Sinclair <dsinclai@acs.ucalgary.ca>
Subject: Re: hardware RNG
In-Reply-To: <9306220012.AA37450@acs1.acs.ucalgary.ca>
Message-ID: <9306220859.AA01020@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> persuade a single diode to be noisy yet.  Anyhow, I turned to the simplest
> white noise source that I have, which happens to be a radio tuned to a dead
> channel. . .
> What other method could be used to attack this except for the
> obvious tempest attack on the host computer?

Well, the most obvious is for the attacker to TRANSMIT on that
frequency.  Then they control the 'random' data you are getting.

	John






Thread