From: nobody@soda.berkeley.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 51c83b5c452ea8786b7c7d97a214b30f4aeed7c46f05af304d1caf0cd583ba45
Message ID: <9307070403.AA05223@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-07 04:07:14 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 6 Jul 93 21:07:14 PDT
From: nobody@soda.berkeley.edu
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 93 21:07:14 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Encrypted list software
Message-ID: <9307070403.AA05223@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've had a couple of people ask to have their names added to the
encrypted list forwarder I put together. I'm soliciting feedback on
how this service should work.
Right now, it only encrypts the "body" of the message. The "headers",
which are the "From:" and "Subject:" lines, etc., are passed through
basically unchanged (except for "To:", which I change to be the person it
is going to. Maybe that's unnecessary, as I notice that the cypherpunks
list puts its own address into "To:", for some reason.) It also adds
"Encrypted: PGP" to the headers.
I wonder if it would be better for it to encrypt the whole message, headers
and body together, then to mail that with a fresh new header that would
show nothing about the original message.
The first approach hides the contents of the message, but not its subject
or who it is from; the second hides more. Any suggestions as to which is
more useful?
Hal Finney
hfinney@shell.portal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQCUAgUBLDoazagTA69YIUw3AQEVIQP4yImWVmyipsNbMUu8pX4QkyPx9T/95MVP
lTc+LAFwACUSbm2/DNTqLOLbDhb9rnMlHT/926mjoJFC4H3xQn61oXzM50GtRiaY
ORJOxJ8CVqmQE7RW51jEAM0wIH4L2CDhveudY6r2ZX7uLjmybkdHJy4G5BSb46cD
x5h93fOyXg==
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1993
Return to “rwhelan@mason1.gmu.edu (Ryan A. Whelan)”