1993-07-22 - Re: forged mail
Header Data
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: baumbach@atmel.com
Message Hash: 52d40e97d483d02128118b02e3f9434dacf3a434b53f8ab354d599c56865d9cd
Message ID: <9307222213.AA26650@toxicwaste.MEDIA.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <9307222111.AA04163@bass.chp.atmel.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-22 22:15:11 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Jul 93 15:15:11 PDT
Raw message
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 93 15:15:11 PDT
To: baumbach@atmel.com
Subject: Re: forged mail
In-Reply-To: <9307222111.AA04163@bass.chp.atmel.com>
Message-ID: <9307222213.AA26650@toxicwaste.MEDIA.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
No, forging e-mail is not a taboo topic, but then again it doesn't buy
you anything if you're up against a smart person. If you just forge
mail to me, most likely I can track you down to at LEAST the machine
you forged it from!
If you go through a remailer, then it strips the headers off, so its
not a problem. But there is no reason to need to forge a message to a
remailer since it hides your identity in the first place. That's its
job.
-derek
Thread
Return to July 1993
- Return to “baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)”
- Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”
Return to “Peter Breton <pbreton@cs.umb.edu>”
- 1993-07-22 (Thu, 22 Jul 93 14:50:10 PDT) - forged mail - baumbach@atmel.com (Peter Baumbach)
- 1993-07-22 (Thu, 22 Jul 93 15:15:11 PDT) - Re: forged mail - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
- 1993-07-23 (Fri, 23 Jul 93 13:15:40 PDT) - Re: forged mail - Peter Breton <pbreton@cs.umb.edu>
- 1993-07-22 (Thu, 22 Jul 93 15:15:11 PDT) - Re: forged mail - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>