1993-07-14 - Re: xor data hiding?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 730471d436b80d19bb145d3e40cef89b76c9f57a3b3d1ddea10162cc1b855758
Message ID: <9307141547.AA28336@snark.shearson.com>
Reply To: <9307140017.AA03238@triton.unm.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-14 15:47:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Jul 93 08:47:40 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 93 08:47:40 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: xor data hiding?
In-Reply-To: <9307140017.AA03238@triton.unm.edu>
Message-ID: <9307141547.AA28336@snark.shearson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu> says:
> According to Douglas Sinclair:

> The point wasn't to be unbreakably secure; it was to be UNFINDABLY
> secure.  We convolute an allready encrypted message to the point of
> not being recognizable as cyphertext, then we hide it on the end of
> a file.  We want it to look like garbage.

Cyphertext from any decent system ALREADY looks random. Whats the
point of doing more to it?

Perry





Thread