1993-07-22 - Re: Thoughts on remailers

Header Data

From: jpp@markv.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: afdde15cf15995a87e994482049511b5935832e04d9aa0a417cedb12d22b95d5
Message ID: <9307211859.aa04589@hermix.markv.com>
Reply To: <9307210647.AA13445@indirect.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-22 02:01:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Jul 93 19:01:02 PDT

Raw message

From: jpp@markv.com
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 93 19:01:02 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Thoughts on remailers
In-Reply-To: <9307210647.AA13445@indirect.com>
Message-ID: <9307211859.aa04589@hermix.markv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  We just discussed a related issue on another list I subscribe to.  I
feel that we want accountability along with anonymity in many
circumstances.  You can deny service to 'bad apples' with out
compromising the identities of anyone who uses your service.  Not even
the identiy of the 'bad apple' need ever be know to you.  Chaum
discusses how this can be achieved cryptographicaly.  Is anyone
working on an implementation?

j'
--
                O I am Jay Prime Positive jpp@markv.com 
1250 bit key fingerprint =  B8 95 E0 AF 9A A2 CD A5  89 C9 F0 FE B4 3A 2C 3F
 524 bit key fingerprint =  8A 7C B9 F2 D5 46 4D ED  66 23 F1 71 DE FF 51 48
Public keys by `finger jpp @hermix.markv.com' or pgp-public-keys@pgp.mit.edu
Your feedback is welcome, directly or via symbol JPP on hex@sea.east.sun.com





Thread