From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0ae8e4963232eee532accac484bb58c898953c028eb22ea9fa9104c91db72c57
Message ID: <9308240153.AA05544@ah.com>
Reply To: <199308232050.AA12556@aerospace.aero.org>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-24 02:02:05 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Aug 93 19:02:05 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 93 19:02:05 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Chaum criticism
In-Reply-To: <199308232050.AA12556@aerospace.aero.org>
Message-ID: <9308240153.AA05544@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I am trying to read and understand the Niels Ferguson "Off-line Coins"
>article, the "Efficient Off-line Digital Cash" paper also from CWI
Both articles, as I recall from the abstracts, exist square within the
observer framework.
>Do the papers I
>just listed require observer chips, or are they OK for software-only?
The two CWI papers do require observers and are useless for
software-only implementations.
>Is there software we can use NOW for ATM's and banks?
The original blind signature still works. It can still be money.
That hasn't changed. Recall, though, that the blind signature is
patented by Chaum in addition to also requiring the underlying RSA
patent.
Eric
Return to August 1993
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”