From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0f7546065ac24acba5f640f216700d158c3b1021019b3a653156c797457c7b45
Message ID: <0w5o8B1w164w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-03 07:57:39 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Aug 93 00:57:39 PDT
From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 93 00:57:39 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Remailer configuration
Message-ID: <0w5o8B1w164w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hal Finney writes and asks what folks think about his remailers - if two are
better than one, etc.
My two cents' worth is that two is better; already we're starting to see
applications (like the UT mail-to-news gateway) where people are filtering
known remailers out. The bigger the list of remailers which might be sending
mail, the harder it'll be to do that sort of thing. I wonder how big the
list would need to get before sysadmins would consider it more economical to
abandon filtering entirely?
Let a thousand flowers bloom.
--
Greg Broiles greg@goldenbear.com
Golden Bear Computer Consulting +1 503 465 0325
Box 12005 Eugene OR 97440 BBS: +1 503 687 7764
Return to August 1993
Return to “greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)”
1993-08-03 (Tue, 3 Aug 93 00:57:39 PDT) - Remailer configuration - greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)