From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: 211063aa4f9dda1d7750c06f1b50a338c55c672a7d13c47d1c955280b3ad512d
Message ID: <9308202024.AA04640@snark.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9308202023.AA04919@netcom5.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-20 20:26:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Aug 93 13:26:57 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 93 13:26:57 PDT
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: Thurn, Thurn, Thurn (und Taxis, too!)
In-Reply-To: <9308202023.AA04919@netcom5.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9308202024.AA04640@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Timothy C. May says:
>
> > > So calling our cyberspace mail drop "alt.waste" would have resonances wit
h
> > > this Oedipal error, allowing the correcting of newbies.
> >
> > Yes, Tim, but none the less creating newsgroups with .s used as
> > puncutation instead of as heirarchy seperators is considered Very
> > Rude. I think there is no reason for us to do something that is
> > considered Very Rude even if it is a good joke. Dashes are likely a
> > good compromise.
> >
> > Perry
>
> I'm confused, Perry. I was acknowledging that "alt.waste" (with no
> periods, no punctuation, in the "waste" part) would be nearly as
> acceptable as the more Pynchonesque form.
>
> Is "alt.waste" a rude formation in some way?
Sorry -- I misunderstood. "alt.waste" would be perfectly fine.
Perry
Return to August 1993
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”