From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
To: dsobel@washofc.cpsr.org
Message Hash: 49c25260cb64c5fc1a4870f3f32a85bdf768b730de19b62a7a231955e139319d
Message ID: <9308112213.AA01510@banff.procase.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-11 22:17:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 15:17:24 PDT
From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 15:17:24 PDT
To: dsobel@washofc.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: Clipper trapdoor?
Message-ID: <9308112213.AA01510@banff.procase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Note that neither Title III (law enforcement) nor FISA (U.S.-based) apply
>to this situation, [...]
>I have to conclude that NSA would not be putting
>this technology out into the world *unless* it did, in fact, have some way
>to decrypt messages *without* access to the escrow keys.
Which is why they probably already have a draft for a bill to get escrowed
keys without a warrant for national security reasons. They would want
the whole escrow process set up before they announce this, of course.
If they can't get this kind of bill passed, then they probably will not
approve the technology for export.
Alternatively, the escrow process may be written with specific wording
that it applies only to US citizens leaving a convenient escrow process
trap-door. This makes the Privacy Clipper difficult to sell overseas,
but specially made chips for export might be compromised anyway with
weak random seeds.
Paul E. Baclace
peb@procase.com
Return to August 1993
Return to “peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)”
1993-08-11 (Wed, 11 Aug 93 15:17:24 PDT) - Re: Clipper trapdoor? - peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)