1993-08-25 - Re: No digital coins (was: Chaum on the wrong foot?)

Header Data

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 78d61e5bd73dbcad13f38fa5bbb8c75cd8ca5cd65affc39f4ff33a3a51d31693
Message ID: <9308250838.AA20693@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-25 10:35:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Aug 93 03:35:36 PDT

Raw message

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 93 03:35:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: No digital coins (was: Chaum on the wrong foot?)
Message-ID: <9308250838.AA20693@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  If your goal is only privacy of personal information not economic privacy
you would do better to support Clipper-like systems (such as DigiCash
with an IRS-Tax Backdoor). Supporting untracable perfectly secure
cash will make taxation and state economic planning hard if not impossible.
It is contradictory for a liberal to support DigiCash, Strong Cryptography,
etc because effective collective coercion requires personal information.
All you have to do is take perfect anonymity to its natural conclusion
and you see where it leads. (and it ain't socialism)








Thread