1993-08-16 - Re: Electronic Democracy
Header Data
From: szabo@netcom.com (Nick Szabo)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 92394b99fde383cf54ab0d7f5a12609ea9e393cb72604179d4c42c2994361acb
Message ID: <9308161732.AA10330@netcom4.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9308161227.AA19906@pmantis.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-16 17:32:12 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 10:32:12 PDT
Raw message
From: szabo@netcom.com (Nick Szabo)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 10:32:12 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Electronic Democracy
In-Reply-To: <9308161227.AA19906@pmantis.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9308161732.AA10330@netcom4.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This is a great example of a issue we don't need to agree on.
The underlying cryptographic tools needed for private voting
and digital cash are practically the same. Once the common tools
are written, each side can go finish off their own user interfaces,
one labelled "cash market" and the other "voting booth".
So let's quit bickering and write those tools!
Nick Szabo szabo@netcom.com
Thread
Return to August 1993
- Return to “nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu”
Return to “szabo@netcom.com (Nick Szabo)”
- 1993-08-16 (Mon, 16 Aug 93 05:27:06 PDT) - Re: Electronic Democracy - nobody@pmantis.berkeley.edu
- 1993-08-16 (Mon, 16 Aug 93 10:32:12 PDT) - Re: Electronic Democracy - szabo@netcom.com (Nick Szabo)