From: Jamie Jamison <jamie@apl.washington.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a95744bdfa6381cd57f6e67cd61552417d0fd4c40018f1a8b02fc9b993a41755
Message ID: <Pine.3.07.9308301001.A4768-b100000@hopper>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-30 18:23:47 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 30 Aug 93 11:23:47 PDT
From: Jamie Jamison <jamie@apl.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 93 11:23:47 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Privacy issues and how to sell them
Message-ID: <Pine.3.07.9308301001.A4768-b100000@hopper>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From reading the group it seems to me that there is a need for two styles
of data encryption. One style would be something similar to DES, it would
be a standard cypher and would be used for encrypting items such as the
files on your hard disk. The other would be a public key cypher and would
be used for communicating between individuals.
Now, as far as selling these two concepts goes one thing that
might help is to point out the fact that not only is the government
untrustworthy, in the sense that they abuse their power, but that they're
also incompetent. Americans have an unfortunate tendency, at least in my
eyes to, buy into catch-phrases such as "law and order" or "national
security" in a completely uncritical fashion. However Americans also
mistrust, and rightfully so, the competence of the government, so perhaps
we should point out that since the government can't keep its own secrets
very well that it obviously can't keep the secrets of 250 million citizens
very well either, which is what the government would be attempting to do
if SkipJack/Clipper/Capstone were made the national standard for encryption.
Jamie Jamison
WITH STANDARD DISCLAIMER
Return to August 1993
Return to “Jamie Jamison <jamie@apl.washington.edu>”
1993-08-30 (Mon, 30 Aug 93 11:23:47 PDT) - Privacy issues and how to sell them - Jamie Jamison <jamie@apl.washington.edu>